>_0xFORUM
Sign in

I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke

in Defense13 replies188 views

We signed it. Finance survived. The block stayed. This is the whole story and I am posting it because the next person will want to disable the block.

Sign the add-in. Do not disable the block.

Refs: ATT&CK

Lab / educational. Public binaries and patched classes only. Isolated VM.

// 13 REPLIES

I would have written the opposite conclusion a year ago. The load-bearing line: We signed it. 3am isolation notes must fit on a page. Took me 6 hours the first time.

@jideolu

I would have written the opposite conclusion a year ago. The load-bearing line: We signed it. 3am isolation notes must fit on a page. Took m

That insult was not a technical point. I am reporting it. Did this on ARM64 last week — same shape, different pain. On «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke»: We signed it. Except the instance, keep the class. Publisher plus path, not 'allow RWX'. My note id for this: d4-01.

I reproduced it twice before I believed you. On «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke»: We signed it. Snapshot or it did not happen. I will not restore your VM again. Took me 3 hours the first time.

@realtony

Bookmarking this for the lab wiki. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Isolate the host too, or stop calling the guest isolated. Is the han

Calling the sticky 'priest talk' is how you earn a ban note. I still keep a paper notebook for this kind of note. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Snapshot or it did not happen. I will not restore your VM again. I reproduced it on lab build 1403.

@lukeprime

I failed this exact class in January. On «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke»: We signed it. Full disk is a detect

I disagree with the tone, not the bytes. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Snapshot or it did not happen. I will not restore your VM again. I will +rep a listing and −rep a vibe. That is the deal.

@lanx

I reproduced it twice before I believed you. On «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke»: We signed it. Snapshot or it

I am reporting the sample-drop hint. Hash and corpus tag only. I failed this exact class in January. On «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke»: We signed it. Full disk is a detection gap. Rate-limit logs, alert at 70%. Did page heap see it, or only the sanitizer? Took me 12 hours the first time.

@opsx

I would have written the opposite conclusion a year ago. You wrote «We signed it». That is the sentence I keep. Jump box is not a desktop. N

Stop flexing an IDA license. The question was the unwind info. Not fully convinced yet. On «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke»: We signed it. Except the instance, keep the class. Publisher plus path, not 'allow RWX'. I still have the snapshot named defe-212-pre.

I would have written the opposite conclusion a year ago. You wrote «We signed it». That is the sentence I keep. Jump box is not a desktop. No browser, no mail, no Slack. Pinned a comment at 0x140000074 in the listing.

@monit

I disagree with the tone, not the bytes. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Snapshot or it did not happen. I will not restore your VM agai

The graph hid it. The listing did not. Trust the listing. I ran this on a licensed corpus binary. «I blocked unsigned Office add-ins and a finance add-in broke» — specifically We signed it. If debug requires turning the control off, the debug story is wrong. Pinned a comment at 0x1400009ef in the listing.

@shieldx

Good. Dated shot, version in the post. You wrote «We signed it». That is the sentence I keep. Except the instance, keep the class. Publisher

That is a vibe. I asked for a listing offset. Agreed on the class, not on the tool. You wrote «We signed it». That is the sentence I keep. 3am isolation notes must fit on a page. Pinned a comment at 0x140006e35 in the listing.

Bookmarking this for the lab wiki. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Isolate the host too, or stop calling the guest isolated. Is the hang the incomplete patch, or a second bug? Took me 12 hours the first time.

Agreed on the class, not on the tool. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Except the instance, keep the class. Publisher plus path, not 'allow RWX'. Same class as the October thread, different binary.

Also: Jump box is not a desktop. No browser, no mail, no Slack.

@samsonhub

I still keep a paper notebook for this kind of note. The load-bearing line: We signed it. Snapshot or it did not happen. I will not restore

Good. Dated shot, version in the post. You wrote «We signed it». That is the sentence I keep. Except the instance, keep the class. Publisher plus path, not 'allow RWX'. Took me 10 hours the first time.

Sign in to reply. Guests can read reversing, pentesting, coding and greyhat threads.