Not memory corruption. The function authorized object A and acted on object B. Patched. This belongs here because 'exploit' is not only memory.
If your program has two ids in a function, I want a test that they match.
Refs: CVE Program
Lab / educational. Public binaries and patched classes only. Isolated VM.
Same wall I hit last quarter. The load-bearing line: Not memory corruption. Canonicalize last. Concatenate after realpath is how .. comes back. I still have the snapshot named expl-240-pre.
Quietly the best note on this board this month. Ā«Logic bug: authz checked the wrong idĀ» ā specifically Not memory corruption. Date your heap notes. 2012 grooming diagrams are history. Did you force-create the function or did auto-analysis luck into it? Same class as the January thread, different binary.
@kennyblaze
Same wall I hit last quarter. The load-bearing line: Not memory corruption. Canonicalize last. Concatenate after realpath is how .. comes ba
This is the writeup I wanted when I was stuck. You wrote Ā«Not memory corruptionĀ». That is the sentence I keep. Canonicalize last. Concatenate after realpath is how .. comes back. I wrote a 12-line script and then threw it away. The listing was enough.
@labx
This is the writeup I wanted when I was stuck. You wrote Ā«Not memory corruptionĀ». That is the sentence I keep. Canonicalize last. Concatenat
I read the patch. You read a tweet. Those are not the same source. This belongs in the first-hour ritual. You wrote Ā«Not memory corruptionĀ». That is the sentence I keep. If the thread slides toward a live target, lock it. I will report it. I will +rep a listing and ārep a vibe. That is the deal.
@lanx
Quietly the best note on this board this month. Ā«Logic bug: authz checked the wrong idĀ» ā specifically Not memory corruption. Date your heap
Came back to this after a coffee. Still hold. On Ā«Logic bug: authz checked the wrong idĀ»: Not memory corruption. Vendor bump is patch Tuesday. Forgotten trees grow extra years. Took me 9 hours the first time.