>_0xFORUM
Sign in

MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them

in Tools11 replies439 views

If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. If you say 'whatever', I will not run it. MIT or public domain. I have a job.

Licenses are not bureaucracy. They are how I keep the lab.

Refs: Ghidra

Lab / educational. Public binaries and patched classes only. Isolated VM.

// 11 REPLIES

The screenshot is the useful part of the post. On Ā«MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take themĀ»: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Profile YARA. One looping regex will eat a core. I will +rep a listing and āˆ’rep a vibe. That is the deal.

@mosesprime

The screenshot is the useful part of the post. On «MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them»: If you DM me a script with no licen

I am not moving this to DMs so you can yell. Stay on the class. I tried the naive path first and wasted a morning. You wrote «If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask». That is the sentence I keep. Dirty VM means throw it. Do not apt upgrade a dirty box. If anyone DMs me a zip I will not open it. Hash in-thread.

@opzsec

Not fully convinced yet. The load-bearing line: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Profile YARA. One looping regex will eat

That is not what the listing shows. You are arguing a vibe. Bookmarking this for the lab wiki. On «MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them»: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. FakeNet that can reach the internet is not a simulator. Did you force-create the function or did auto-analysis luck into it? Version in my shot: current lab snapshot, not last year's blog.

Not fully convinced yet. The load-bearing line: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Profile YARA. One looping regex will eat a core. Took me 11 hours the first time.

@reconx

This matches a public n-day class from last patch Tuesday. The load-bearing line: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Dirty V

I read the patch. You read a tweet. Those are not the same source. The screenshot is the useful part of the post. On «MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them»: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Transfer samples as a hashed read-only ISO. Not drag-drop. My note id for this: 125-05.

@ports

Bookmarking this for the lab wiki. On «MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them»: If you DM me a script with no license, I will a

This matches a public n-day class from last patch Tuesday. The load-bearing line: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Dirty VM means throw it. Do not apt upgrade a dirty box. I still have the snapshot named tool-293-pre.

I want the listing, not the decompiler story. The load-bearing line: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Profile YARA. One looping regex will eat a core. If anyone DMs me a zip I will not open it. Hash in-thread.

@shola_k

I want the listing, not the decompiler story. The load-bearing line: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Profile YARA. One lo

Call-convention guess is not evidence. I failed this exact class in January. Ā«MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take themĀ» — specifically If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Name snapshots date plus hash plus pre/post. 'snapshot 12' loses a week. If anyone DMs me a zip I will not open it. Hash in-thread.

This belongs in the first-hour ritual. Ā«MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take themĀ» — specifically If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Tools snapshot in 8 minutes or you will not restore it. Did you force-create the function or did auto-analysis luck into it? I wrote a 12-line script and then threw it away. The listing was enough.

@sysx

This belongs in the first-hour ritual. Ā«MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take themĀ» — specifically If you DM me a script with no li

Do not call people skids because they use Ghidra. I tried the naive path first and wasted a morning. On «MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them»: If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. Name snapshots date plus hash plus pre/post. 'snapshot 12' loses a week. Pinned a comment at 0x140000f4f in the listing.

@uptownkid

I tried the naive path first and wasted a morning. On «MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take them»: If you DM me a script with no l

Good. Dated shot, version in the post. Ā«MIT license on lab scripts, or I will not take themĀ» — specifically If you DM me a script with no license, I will ask. FakeNet that can reach the internet is not a simulator. I wrote a 12-line script and then threw it away. The listing was enough.

Sign in to reply. Guests can read reversing, pentesting, coding and greyhat threads.