Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)

@wiseking

This matches a public n-day class from last patch Tuesday. «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)» — specifically I want

This is getting personal and it does not need to. I will argue the opposite and then probably agree. You wrote «I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe». That is the sentence I keep. If you DM samples I will not open them. I still have the snapshot named gene-298-pre.

Good. Dated shot, version in the post. The load-bearing line: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. If you DM samples I will not open them. I still have the snapshot named gene-298-pre.

@adewale_k

Good. Dated shot, version in the post. The load-bearing line: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. If you DM sa

That insult was not a technical point. I am reporting it. This is the writeup I wanted when I was stuck. «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)» — specifically I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. If you DM samples I will not open them. I still have the snapshot named gene-298-pre.

Bookmarking this for the lab wiki. On «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)»: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. Public binary means licensed, owned, or your own crackme. Not 'I found it'. After you did that, did the decompiler pick it up or did you dump? My note id for this: 12a-08.

@bayo_k

Bookmarking this for the lab wiki. On «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)»: I want talks with demos on public binaries

I am reporting the sample-drop hint. Hash and corpus tag only. If you only have the decompiler, you do not have the bug. On «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)»: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. If you DM samples I will not open them. My note id for this: 12a-09.

This is the writeup I wanted when I was stuck. On «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)»: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. Defenders belong here. Detections are first-class. I reproduced it on lab build 1226.

@sniff

This is the writeup I wanted when I was stuck. On «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)»: I want talks with demos on pub

You keep moving the goalposts. First it was the decoder, now it is the dump. Quietly the best note on this board this month. On «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)»: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. Bonded is a bond, not a halo. Use escrow. I wrote a 12-line script and then threw it away. The listing was enough.

This is the kind of thread that should be a sticky and is not. The load-bearing line: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. Fail writeups teach more than win writeups. If anyone DMs me a zip I will not open it. Hash in-thread.

@timmyvibes

This is the kind of thread that should be a sticky and is not. The load-bearing line: I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches

Decompiler output is a hypothesis. Treat it like one. This belongs in the first-hour ritual. You wrote «I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe». That is the sentence I keep. Bonded is a bond, not a halo. Use escrow. Was this on the licensed corpus or a crackme you wrote? I still have the snapshot named gene-298-pre.

@virtz

This belongs in the first-hour ritual. You wrote «I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe». That is the sentence I

This matches a public n-day class from last patch Tuesday. «Conference talks worth watching this year (public, free)» — specifically I want talks with demos on public binaries and patches, not vibe. Snapshots are the product. The tools are replaceable. My note id for this: 12a-04.